Trump v BBC – a guide to the case

13th January 2026

This resource page sets out the key developments in the case, with links, and it will be updated from time-to-time

*

This post sets out the key developments in the case of President Donald Trump vs the British Broadcasting Corporation. It is a copy of the post on Substack.

The intention is to update it from time-to-time. New additions will be marked **.

Please note that I am not an American lawyer and I am thereby open to corrections of terminology and substance about the United States litigation.

 

*

 

Other pages to keep an eye on are:

The online court docket

A Wikipedia page on the original BBC bias allegations

The United Kingdom parliament Culture Media and Sport select committee (CMS Committee) news page

 

*

 

November 2024 – the original broadcast **

The relevant Panorama programme was broadcast on 7 November 2024 **, a week before the presidential election.

The BBC page for the programme is here.

The page shows the following information about the broadcasts:

There is no direct evidence that anyone in the United States saw the programme when broadcast and BBC iPlayer is not formally available to United States viewers. (Yes, we all know about VPNs etc.)

The full programme is not (properly) currently available, but the following shows the spliced footage at the centre of the case:

 

*

 

November 2025 – the leaked Prescott memorandum

The next development is one year later **, with a Telegraph newspaper report about the leak/disclosure of a memorandum written by Michael Prescott, a former external advisor to the BBC’s Editorial Guidelines and Standards Committee (EGSC).

The memorandum appears undated, but it was considered at a meeting of the BBC EGSC on 17 October 2025, and it appears Prescott raised his concerns on the programme internally within the BBC in or before May 2025.

A copy of the memorandum can be found as an appendix to this later BBC letter to the CMS select committee.

In respect of the Panorama footage, the memorandum stated:

 

*

 

November 2025 – the UK parliament takes an interest

Things then move quickly.

The UK parliament’s CMS Committee write to the BBC chair on 4 November 2025.

The letter is here.

It states:

The following day the CMS Committee also announces it will take evidence.

On 10 November 2025 the chair of the BBC responds, setting out the BBC position and appending the Prescott memorandum.

 

*

 

November 2025 – the Trump legal letter

On 9 November 2025 – the day before the BBC respond to the CMS Committee – the BBC receive a letter before action from Trump’s lawyer.

The letter is here and it states:

My initial commentary on the letter is here – and the letter I suggested the BBC could send back is here.

 

*

 

November 2025 – resignations at the BBC

The same day as the legal letter, the BBC director general and CEO of news both resign.

Their resignation letters are here. The Panorama programme is mentioned only once, in the CEO of news’s letter.

The departing director general does not mention the Panorama programme at all in his letter and he attributes his departure to other things.

Two days later the CMS Committee widen the scope of the evidence they are seeking.

 

*

December 2025 – the BBC apologise – but do not offer damages

On 13 December 2025 the BBC do two things.

First, they issue a statement:

Second, treating it any other complaint with validity, this is published on their corrections and clarifications page:

The BBC itself reports these developments under this headline:

We do not have access to the copies of the letters sent by the BBC directly to President Trump and to his lawyers.

But the BBC itself reported the following:

My posts on these developments:

Why the BBC is right not to pay damages to Trump

The BBC is right not to pay damages to Trump (New Statesman)

 

*

 

November 2025 – the FCC’s odd intervention

Next, on 19 November 2025, is an odd intervention by the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requesting information from the BBC on the extent of any broadcast or publication of the programme in the United States. The letter is here.

My post on this eccentric intervention, suggesting that it indicated evidential problems for Trump and his lawyers, is here.

There seems to be no trace of a formal response by the BBC.

 

*

 

November 2025 – A parliamentary witness session

On 24 November 2025 the CMS Select Committee interview various witnesses including the chair of the BBC and Prescott. The transcript is here.

Follow-on correspondence between the committee and the BBC is here and here.

 

*

 

December 2025 – Trump suggests AI is to blame

On 15 December 2025 President Donald Trump says: “I’m suing the BBC for putting words in my mouth… I guess they used AI or something.”

AI however seems to be not part of the case brought by his lawyers.

 

*

December 2025 – Trump files his complaint

Also on 15 December 2025 Trump and his lawyers file their 33-page legal complaint.

My posts on this filing:

A guided tour of President Trump’s 33-page, $5 billion lawsuit against the British Broadcasting Corporation 

Donald Trump v the British Broadcasting Corporation: the battle begins The president filed a claim this week more about exerting leverage than legal niceties (Prospect)

 

*

 

December 2025 – the UK parliament seem to wrap up their investigation

A few days later on 19 December 2025 the CMS Committee appears to being its investigation to an end, welcoming proposed reforms:

The BBC, in turn, publish those proposals and other documents on the Prescott memorandum.

 

*

 

January 2026 – The BBC file their first motion, for a stay

On 12 January 2026 the BBC file a motion to stay discovery of evidence pending a forthcoming motion to dismiss.

 

[To be updated.]

 

** UPDATES

13 January 2026 – date of Panorama programme corrected and consequential changes